TY - GEN
AU - Thomas Haiden
AU - L. Magnusson
AU - Ivan Tsonevsky
AU - Fredrik Wetterhall
AU - L. Alfieri
AU - Florian Pappenberger
AU - Patricia de Rosnay
AU - J. Munoz-Sabater
AU - Gianpaolo Balsamo
AU - C. Albergel
AU - Richard Forbes
AU - Tim Hewson
AU - S. Malardel
AU - David Richardson
AB - A case of orographically enhanced, extreme precipitation which led to extensive flooding in Central Europe is investigated. The ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) provided good forecasts of the location of the heaviest precipitation on the northern side of the Alps but underestimated the magnitude. As a result, streamflow predictions for the Danube by the European Flood Alert System (EFAS) run with ECMWF input underestimated peak discharge values. We investigate possible causes for the underestimation such as model resolution, the microphysical parameterization, and soil moisture in the model. Increasing the model resolution has a substantial positive effect on the magnitude of the predicted rainfall in the worst affected region on the northern side of the Alps. It also improves forecasts over the Czech Republic where an observed, non-orographic band of enhanced precipitation is predicted which was not simulated in the operational forecast. A new parameterization of precipitation formation which will become operational in 2014 is shown to have a positive effect as well, leading to about 10% increase in total precipitation on the northern side of the Alps. Experiments with different options for soil moisture assimilation show little effect since the near-saturated conditions due to positive rainfall anomalies in the weeks prior to the event were already well captured by the soil model in the IFS, even without soil moisture assimilation.
BT - ECMWF Technical Memoranda
DA - 06/2014
DO - 10.21957/4p9ebc2r3
LA - eng
M1 - 723
N2 - A case of orographically enhanced, extreme precipitation which led to extensive flooding in Central Europe is investigated. The ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) provided good forecasts of the location of the heaviest precipitation on the northern side of the Alps but underestimated the magnitude. As a result, streamflow predictions for the Danube by the European Flood Alert System (EFAS) run with ECMWF input underestimated peak discharge values. We investigate possible causes for the underestimation such as model resolution, the microphysical parameterization, and soil moisture in the model. Increasing the model resolution has a substantial positive effect on the magnitude of the predicted rainfall in the worst affected region on the northern side of the Alps. It also improves forecasts over the Czech Republic where an observed, non-orographic band of enhanced precipitation is predicted which was not simulated in the operational forecast. A new parameterization of precipitation formation which will become operational in 2014 is shown to have a positive effect as well, leading to about 10% increase in total precipitation on the northern side of the Alps. Experiments with different options for soil moisture assimilation show little effect since the near-saturated conditions due to positive rainfall anomalies in the weeks prior to the event were already well captured by the soil model in the IFS, even without soil moisture assimilation.
PB - ECMWF
PY - 2014
EP - 34
T2 - ECMWF Technical Memoranda
TI - ECMWF forecast performance during the June 2013 flood in Central Europe
UR - https://www.ecmwf.int/node/9731
ER -