TY - GEN
AU - J.M. Wilkinson
AU - Robin Hogan
AU - A.J. Illingworth
AU - Angela Benedetti
AB - The performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model in simulating cloud is evaluated using observations by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) lidar on the ICESat satellite. In order to account for lidar attenuation in the comparison, we use model variables to simulate the attenuated backscatter using a lidar forward model. This generates a new model cloud fraction that can then be fairly compared to the ICESat lidar. Lidar forward model and ICESat comparison is performed over fifteen days (equivalent to 226 orbits of Earth, or roughly 9 million km) of data. The model is assessed by cloud fraction statistics, skill scores and its ability to simulate lidar backscatter. The results show that the model generally simulates the occurrence and location of cloud well, but overestimates the mean amount when present of the ice cloud by around 10%, particularly in the tropics. The skill of the model is slightly better over the land than over the sea. The model also has some problems representing the amount when present in tropical boundary layer cloud, particularly over land, where there is an underestimate by as much as 15%. Calculations of backscatter reveal that the ECMWF model predicts the lidar backscatter to within 5% on average, for a lidar ratio of 20 sr, apart from in thick ice clouds. Sensitivity tests show that realistic variations in extinction-to-backscatter ratio and effective radius affect the forward modeled mean cloud fraction by no more than 10%.
BT - ECMWF Technical Memoranda
DA - 02/2008
DO - 10.21957/to8saqzak
LA - eng
M1 - 555
N2 - The performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model in simulating cloud is evaluated using observations by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) lidar on the ICESat satellite. In order to account for lidar attenuation in the comparison, we use model variables to simulate the attenuated backscatter using a lidar forward model. This generates a new model cloud fraction that can then be fairly compared to the ICESat lidar. Lidar forward model and ICESat comparison is performed over fifteen days (equivalent to 226 orbits of Earth, or roughly 9 million km) of data. The model is assessed by cloud fraction statistics, skill scores and its ability to simulate lidar backscatter. The results show that the model generally simulates the occurrence and location of cloud well, but overestimates the mean amount when present of the ice cloud by around 10%, particularly in the tropics. The skill of the model is slightly better over the land than over the sea. The model also has some problems representing the amount when present in tropical boundary layer cloud, particularly over land, where there is an underestimate by as much as 15%. Calculations of backscatter reveal that the ECMWF model predicts the lidar backscatter to within 5% on average, for a lidar ratio of 20 sr, apart from in thick ice clouds. Sensitivity tests show that realistic variations in extinction-to-backscatter ratio and effective radius affect the forward modeled mean cloud fraction by no more than 10%.
PB - ECMWF
PY - 2008
EP - 23
T2 - ECMWF Technical Memoranda
TI - Use of a lidar forward model for global comparisons of cloud fraction between the ICESat lidar and the ECMWF model.
UR - https://www.ecmwf.int/node/13101
ER -